Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adding support for linux-ppc64le #329

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

adilhusain-s
Copy link

*Made changes to support linux-ppc64le arch

please review and merge.

@adilhusain-s adilhusain-s requested a review from a team as a code owner February 6, 2023 14:48
@dsame
Copy link
Contributor

dsame commented Aug 3, 2023

Hello @adilhusain-s , can you please add e2e test to make sure the action produces inux-ppc64le binaries and change the README to reflect new input values.

@dsame dsame added feature request New feature or request to improve the current logic investigation The issue is under investigation and removed investigation The issue is under investigation labels Aug 3, 2023
@dsame dsame self-assigned this Aug 11, 2023
@dsame dsame self-requested a review August 16, 2023 06:10
Copy link
Contributor

@dsame dsame left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since 1.21.x both ppc64 and ppc64le are supported https://go.dev/dl/?mode=json&include=all and the PR can not be accepted in the current state.

It must be modified either to accept ppc64 and ppc64le arch or use ppc64 for ppc64le archtecture only for the go version below 1.21

@dsame
Copy link
Contributor

dsame commented Aug 16, 2023

Hello @adilhusain-s finally we went to conclusion there's no need in the PR since 1.21 supports both ppc64 and ppc64le and architectures can be used without the translation.

@dsame dsame closed this Aug 16, 2023
@adilhusain-s adilhusain-s deleted the linux-ppc64le branch August 16, 2023 16:22
@shahidhs-ibm shahidhs-ibm mentioned this pull request Jan 8, 2024
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature request New feature or request to improve the current logic
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants